CASPer Test 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

The argument against limiting refugee entry to families only is grounded in the potential for discrimination and the failure to effectively address security concerns. Focusing solely on family units can overlook the merits and needs of individuals or individuals escaping dangerous situations who do not have family members available to accompany them. By restricting entry to families, the policy may inadvertently exclude individuals in urgent need of refuge, such as single individuals or those fleeing persecution without family ties.

Moreover, implementing a family-only entry policy may not inherently improve security; it could create blind spots where people with genuine need for asylum are unable to gain entry based solely on their family status. This could lead to a system that is both inefficient and inequitable, failing to balance humanitarian needs with security objectives adequately. Such a viewpoint advocates for a more inclusive approach to refugee resettlement that considers individual circumstances beyond familial connections.